Chemicals and Market Impact

While we continue to see valiant efforts from the polyethylene producers to increase prices further in June, this is what we used to refer to as a “cow in front of a train” strategy. In that throwing a cow in front of a train was not going to stop it, but it might slow it down a bit! Barring weather, it is inevitable that US polyethylene prices shown in the chart below will start to give back some of their premium pricing over the coming months. One factor among several others pointed out on today's Daily Report is that Ethylene is much weaker and the international markets are materially out of line, and if freight rates have peaked, the arbitrage will undermine prices in the US.  Producers will do their best to hang on to the high margins for as long as they can, and a few more cows may be sacrificed, but the weather is their only hope.

The easing of US base chemical spot pricing continues and has now spread, as expected to polymer grade propylene. Supply now appears to be back to levels that do not reflect weather-related interruptions and despite the very strong downstream demand in the US the inevitable monomer surpluses are appearing. The US is a net importer of benzene and consequently, we see a floor being reached pretty quickly here, and while propylene prices could drop much further, PDH economics will provide support, and with a higher propane price, that support will likely be much higher than the price support for ethylene.

The weakness in US monomer pricing has stalled this week, and buyers and sellers may be exploring marginal export or derivative export opportunities at these levels. Further weakness will come if attempts to export only serve to undermine pricing in the markets they are targeting. Underlying demand remains very strong and this is a supply-driven issue as US ethylene plants run back towards full rates and incremental refinery supply impacts the benzene and propylene markets.  See today's report which includes detailed commentary on methanol in addition to the products in the chart.

Scatter charts with significant outlying points are always eye-catching and the exhibit below is no exception. The extremes of the chart are interesting as they show that when US polymer prices are low, Asia generally trades at a premium, and when US prices are high Asia trades at a discount. But today’s discount is several standard deviations from the norm, and it is too compelling a trade to ignore. If the US was short polyethylene we would be less focused on this arbitrage but that is not the case. Unilateral decisions from US producers to keep production in line with contract demand could maintain pricing support, but the competitive disadvantage that this places on US consumers – especially in durable applications (where the polymer is a larger part of the finished product cost) is significant. It is also a major cost headwind for the packaging companies in the US, and tough to pass through in most cases on staples and household products, because of the buying power of the major food and drug retailers.

The chart below and the others in our daily report linked add more weight to our argument that polymer grade propylene prices in the US have some downside and that it could happen relatively quickly, especially if ethylene producers play the current propane feedstock arbitrage to their full extent. Given weaker propylene derivative markets outside the US, propylene derivative pricing would likely come under some negative pressure if propylene prices fell.

Referring back to our daily report today, can polyethylene hold on? Despite the strength in US polyethylene prices and the aggressive attempts by sellers to hold on through the quarter, there are couple of key factors working against them. Local supply may be tight in the US, but as we discussed yesterday, ethylene is moving towards a global surplus that could push US prices even lower than we are seeing this week and as the chart below shows clearly, how large the gap between Asian ethylene prices and those in the US. Unlike ethylene, polyethylene is harder to trade in to the US, partly because it is an unusual movement and the shipping costs are high, as would be the cost of getting from a US port to a consumer, but partly because US consumers serving the higher end of the market are very grade and quality conscious and would concerned about product quality and the risk of sending something to their customers that does not do the job as well.

Pessimism in the Asia ethylene market is a bad sign for ethylene vs. other US monomers. Those in the US with ethylene surpluses may need to fight a bit harder to find homes for the excess product in the US. We have not focused on the cost curve for a while as markets have been tight and global costs have not been an influence in the market for some time. The US has plenty of dry powder, in that export prices can fall significantly before they approach ethane-based costs, and can fall below production costs outside the US – especially in Asia – and still generate a margin for the US sellers. But that would mean more downside for US spot pricing and it may be enough to create some surpluses and some downward pressure on US derivative pricing. The caveat, of course, is that we had the same setup last year, albeit with less new capacity in Asia, and the summer hurricane season quickly wiped away any US surplus. A better understanding of the current cost curve and relative regional pricing can be found in our Weekly from Monday.

Prices for housing products such as lumber and PVC appear to have hit a pause on their upward march, in part because of lower housing starts, which may be linked to the higher costs – recent estimates suggested that the lumber price moves alone had added $15,000 to the cost of building an average home this year. The overall momentum in the housing market remains strong and the recent lower housing start number could be a one-off.   We maintain our preference for the PVC players and still believe that the underlying fundamentals are less precarious than they are for other polymers. See more in Today's Daily.

This headline about China creating petrochemical deflation is largely based on the rate of capacity addition within China and that base chemical pricing in China still sits well above costs – but the argument may be flawed on a couple of levels. First, costs may not fall materially, given the increased thirst for imported naphtha and propane, as well as crude to fill new refining capacity. If crude prices fall, China will see lower costs, but then so will others. The margin issue is also in question because the wave of China’s new base chemical capacity is arriving amid a surge in demand growth, and this is why margins in Asia have not fallen closer to costs yet. China remains a meaningful importer of many base chemicals – less than two years ago for many products, but still meaningful, and it is the surpluses in the US and the Middle East that may drive deflation should supply chains stabilize and production rates remain high.